Following a court ruling, a rush to buy Ola Electric shares sparked a case involving the owner's arrest.
- bySherya
- 18 Feb, 2026
Ola Electric Shares: Ola Electric shares are seeing significant investor interest today. Ola Electric shares have surged nearly 5% in today's trading session.

Bhavish Aggarwal, owner of Ola Electric company
Ola Electric Share: Shares of Ola Electric Mobility Ltd. are shining brightly on Wednesday, the third trading day of the week. Ola Electric shares have gained nearly 5% so far in today's trading session.
The stock price of this electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer rose 4.9% today to reach ₹29.35 per share, marking the fastest single-day gain since February 3rd of this year. One reason for this surge in the company's shares is the Bombay High Court's stay of the arrest warrant issued against the company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO). This has sparked a rush to buy Ola Electric shares on the stock market today.
Ola Electric shares in recovery mode
According to a Bloomberg report, today's surge in shares has broken a four-day losing streak for Ola Electric. It is currently trading at 2.8 times its average 30-day trading volume. Ola Electric shares had touched an all-time low of ₹27.36 on February 17th.
This suggests it is currently in recovery mode. With a market cap of ₹12,800.23 crore, the company is trading nearly 60% below its issue price of ₹76. In August 2024, the shares hit an all-time high of ₹157.40. This represents a decline of nearly 80%. Ola Electric shares have fallen by 20% since January.
What is the matter of arrest?
Ola Electric has announced that the Bombay High Court has stayed a warrant issued by the South Goa District Consumer Commission against the company's owner, Bhavish Aggarwal. The court also found that the commission exceeded its jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act when issuing the warrant.
The case arose from a complaint filed by Pritesh Chandra Ghadi, who stated that problems persisted with his second-generation Ola S1 scooter despite repairs. The complainant sought a refund of ₹1.47 lakh and an additional ₹50,000 for mental harassment.



